Oregon Supreme Court, 1918

Hendry v. Hendry

Oregon Supreme Court · Decided April 9, 1918 · Bean, McBride, McCamant, Moore

88 Or. 321; 171 P. 1051; 1918 Ore. LEXIS 37

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

Lidfors v. Pflaum (Or. 1925)
Markel v. Transamerica Title Insurance Company (Ariz. 1968)
Elwert v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (District Court, D. Oregon 1956)
Igo v. Butler (Or. 1953)
Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation District (Or. 1944)
Kuhnhausen v. Stadelman (Or. 1944)
Keegan v. Lenzie (Or. 1943)
Abrams v. Rushlight (Or. 1937)
Darling-Singer Lumber Co. v. Oriental Navigation Co. (Or. 1928)
Miner v. Zweifel (Or. 1926)
Lauderback v. Multnomah County (Or. 1924)
Jeffries v. Pankow (Or. 1924)
Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident Commission (Or. 1922)
Gess v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (Idaho 1920)
Siverson v. Clanton (Or. 1918)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, C. J.

1. In these cases a recital of the testimony is worse than valueless, serving only to spread upon the record the details of domestic discord, of which the least said the better. The testimony is contradictory, and as the trial judge had the witnesses before him he was much better able to appraise the value of the testimony than we. Upon the whole, we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree, and it is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Moore, McCamant and Bean, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.