Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.

Oregon Supreme Court
Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co., 96 Or. 32 (Or. 1920)
188 P. 973; 1920 Ore. LEXIS 143
McBride

Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.

Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, C. J.

For the reasons stated in a former appeal, from an order requiring defendant to produce *33its books (95 Or. 609, 188 Pac. 418), we bold that the order is not appealable. It is not a final order, which, in effect, determines the suit, but is a mere interlocutory order which must await the final determination of the suit before it can be reviewed here, if appealable at all: Clay v. Clay, 56 Or. 538 (108 Pac. 119, 109 Pac. 129).

The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
BAILLIE v. COLUMBIA GOLD MINING CO.
Status
Published