Oregon Supreme Court, 1922

Sword v. East Oregon Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court · Decided January 16, 1922 · Bean, Burnett, Harris

106 Or. 458; 211 P. 941

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Investment Service Co. v. Martin Bros. Container & Timber Products Corp. (Or. 1970)
Godell v. Johnson (Or. 1966)
Tillamook County Bank v. International Lumber Co. (Or. 1922)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

HARRIS, J.,

Dissenting. — The material facts in the case of Anderson v. East Oregon Lumber Co. constitute the material facts in this cause. For the reasons expressed in the companion case, I am of the opinion that Sword has a remedy for the wrong done him, if any was done, if the defendant was the doer of such wrong; and I therefore dissent from the ruling that the plaintiff as an individual is remediless.

Mr. Justice Bean concurs in this dissent.

Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, J.

This case was heard on appeal with, and involves precisely the same issues determined in Anderson v. East Oregon Lumber Co., post, *459p. 459 (211 Pac. 937), this day decided. As in that case, the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and Remanded. Rehearing Denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.