Nicklin v. Parsley
Nicklin v. Parsley
Opinion of the Court
In 1893 the legislature passed an act, commonly called the herd law (Sess. Laws 1893, p. 89), which provided in terms for determining by vote whether or not stock should be permitted to run at large in any county in the state, but by a proviso contained in Section 5 of the act all counties in Eastern Oregon, except Umatilla County, were excluded from its provisions.
The act was carried in Bellinger & Cotton’s Code in consecutive sections, numbered 4243 to 4247, inclusive. Various amendments were made to the act, referring in each to the Code sections in Bellinger & Cotton’s and Lord’s Oregon Laws, so as to include Sherman, Morrow and Gilliam Counties, in Eastern Oregon, in its provisions and otherwise to modify its provisions as to certain Western Oregon counties; but, except as to those particular counties, Wasco not being included, the provisions excluding ^Eastern Oregon counties were allowed to stand.
The decree is reversed and the suit dismissed.
Reversed and Suit Dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- NICKLIN v. PARSLEY
- Status
- Published