Wicklander v. Salem Memorial Hospital
Wicklander v. Salem Memorial Hospital
Opinion of the Court
This is an action for damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of negligence of the defendant, Salem Memorial Hospital, while plaintiff was a patient in said hospital. The hospital pleaded
Since this court in Hungerford v. Portland Sanitarium & Benev. Assn., 235 Or 412, 384 P2d 1009 (September 5, 1963), discarded the rule of charitable immunity, this case must be and is reversed.
Concurring Opinion
Specially concurring.
I dissented from the majority opinion in Hungerford v. Portland Sanitarium, 235 Or 412, 384 P2d 1009 (September 5, 1963); but the holding in that case now undoubtedly represents the law of this state. Further dissent would be futile. Although I have full confidence in the. reasons stated in my dissent, I nevertheless believe that it is now my duty to accept the law as held in Hungerford v. Portland Sanitarium, supra. I therefore concur.
Reference
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published