This matter comes before us on the motion of Philip Weinstein for an order restoring his right to practice law.

Weinstein on February 7, 1962 was convicted in the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon of the crime of using the mails to defraud in violation of 18 USC § 1341, and for conspiracy in violation of 18 USC § 371, both of which crimes are felonies. The Oregon State Bar promptly transmitted to this court a certified copy of said judgment of conviction, and based thereon this court on February 13,1962, pursuant to our Rule I,① summarily suspended Weinstein’s right to practice law.

Weinstein appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals, and the appeal culminated in a reversal of the conviction and a dismissal of the indictment. We have been furnished with a certified copy of the order of the United States District Court dismissing the indictment.

*557Our suspension of Weinstein’s right to practice law was based solely on his conviction of a felony. Since the basis for the suspension has been eliminated, the suspension must be revoked and Weinstein’s right to practice law restored.

We adopted Rule I to provide a method to promptly suspend a convicted lawyer’s right to practice law pending the filing and processing of formal disciplinary proceedings. In Weinstein’s case such formal proceedings were instituted, but have been delayed pending his trial and appeal. Our action today is without prejudice to any disciplinary proceedings that may be pending.

Weinstein’s right to practice law is restored, and he is reinstated as a member of the bar.