Moore v. Gladden
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tucker v. Gladden (Or. 1966)
- Moore v. Gladden (District Court, D. Oregon 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is another post conviction case in which the petitioner had plead guilty, in this instance to grand larceny, without the assistance of an attorney and now alleges that he did not knowingly waive the right to counsel. The trial court, in this case, after hearing evidence, made complete findings and concluded that Moore had knowingly waived his right to counsel.
McWilliams v. Gladden, 1965, 242 Or 333, 407 P2d 833, applies. In the instant case the evidence leaves no doubt at all that this man, who had himself been a police officer, knew exactly what he was doing when he waived his right to counsel and that he understood the crime charged and its consequences. The evidence fully supports the trial court’s findings.
Affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Lasley v. Gladden, decided this date.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.