Oregon Supreme Court, 1966

State v. Davidson

Oregon Supreme Court · Decided November 10, 1966 · Goodwin, Holman, Lusk, McAllister, Sloan

244 Or. 636; 419 P.2d 942; 1966 Ore. LEXIS 503

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Newton (Or. Ct. App. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a conviction of the crime of unlawfully selling shares of the capital stock of a corporation which had not been registered with *637the Oregon Corporation Commissioner, in violation of ORS 59.130. Defendant’s sole contention is that he is entitled to reversal because the court denied his motion for a continuance. There is no proper assignment of error in the brief as required by Rule 19. The motion for continuance is not set out in substance, or otherwise. Rule 19 provides: “Assignments of error which the court can consider only by searching the record for the proceedings complained of will not be considered.” This is such a case and we will not consider the alleged error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.