Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for the crimes of larceny, burglary and concealing stolen property.

Defendant contends that he cannot be charged with the separate crimes of larceny, burglary and concealing stolen property because each of the crimes charged arose out of the same, act and transaction.

Under the circumstances of the present case, which we shall not recite, there is no merit to defendant’s contention. Even if there were, defendant failed to except to the court’s instruction or otherwise raise the objections he now presents on appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.