Oregon Supreme Court, 1968

Hill v. Thornton

Hill v. Thornton
Oregon Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1968 · Connell, Denecke, Goodwin, Holman, McAllister, Perry, Sloan
249 Or. 292; 437 P.2d 824; 1968 Ore. LEXIS 645

Hill v. Thornton

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, being dissatisfied with the ballot title prepared by the attorney general for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State, has appealed.

His argument on appeal is that the title as prepared violates the spirit of ORS 254.070.

*293We have carefully examined the ballot title prepared by the attorney general and are of the opinion that the title as prepared is in compliance with the statutes.

The attorney general’s ballot title is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.