Hill v. Thornton

Oregon Supreme Court
Hill v. Thornton, 249 Or. 292 (Or. 1968)
437 P.2d 824; 1968 Ore. LEXIS 645
Connell, Denecke, Goodwin, Holman, McAllister, Perry, Sloan

Hill v. Thornton

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, being dissatisfied with the ballot title prepared by the attorney general for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State, has appealed.

His argument on appeal is that the title as prepared violates the spirit of ORS 254.070.

*293We have carefully examined the ballot title prepared by the attorney general and are of the opinion that the title as prepared is in compliance with the statutes.

The attorney general’s ballot title is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
HILL v. THORNTON
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published