State v. Davidson
State v. Davidson
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of the theft of an automobile and appeals. He contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a change of appointed attorneys and his motion for judgment of acquittal.
During the trial the fiancee advised the court in camera that she would refuse to testify on the ground that her testimony might tend to incriminate her and she was not called as a witness. Since the fiancee did not testify we need not decide whether the court abused its discretion in denying the request of defendant’s attorney to withdraw from the case or the defendant’s motion to appoint a new attorney. The error, if any, was harmless.
There was ample evidence to support the verdict and the court did not err in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.