Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Perry v. Express Services, Inc. (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
- Anthony Lancaster Karen Lancaster v. E.S.S. Corporation, an Arizona Corporation (9th Cir. 1992)
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc. (Or. 1991)
- Riley v. Southwest Marine, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)
- Blacknall v. Westwood Corp., Developers & Contractors (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
- Sugura v. McLaughlin (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
- Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp. (Ala. 1986)
- Childress v. Short (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
- Stone v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. (Or. 1983)
- Spore v. Camac Veneer, Inc. (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
- Westfall v. Multnomah County (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We allowed review in this case to consider the issue whether the defendant had immunity as a “complying employer” under ORS 656.017, as discussed in the last paragraph of the opinion of the Court of Appeals. 46 Or App 263 at 268-269. This issue was first raised by the plaintiff in his Reply Brief on appeal. Moreover, the issue was neither raised, presented, discussed nor considered in the trial court. Therefore, there is little evidence on this issue in the record. For these reasons, we now view the petition as improvidently granted. Day v. SAIF, 288 Or 77, 602 P2d 258 (1979); Fitch v. Public Welfare Div., 279 Or 297, 567 P2d 117 (1977).
Petition dismissed as improvidently granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.