Mora v. Maass

Oregon Supreme Court
Mora v. Maass, 319 Or. 570 (Or. 1994)
877 P.2d 641; 1994 Ore. LEXIS 76
Carson, Fadeley, Gillette, Graber, Hoomissen, Unis

Mora v. Maass

Opinion

affirmed by an equally divided court August 11,

reconsideration denied October 18, 1994

*571Mark J. Geiger, Salem, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review James Anthony Craiger.

Ronald M. Hellewell, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review Joaquin S. Teran.

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With her on a response to the petitions were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Reference

Full Case Name
LUIS ERNESTO MORA, Petitioner-Respondent v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Defendant-Appellant JAMES ANTHONY CRAIGER, on Review v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, on Review THOMAS RICHARD STOFFAL, Petitioner-Respondent v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Defendant-Appellant JOAQUIN S. TERAN, on Review v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, on Review
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published