Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Oregon Supreme Court, 1996

State v. Barajas

State v. Barajas
Oregon Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1996 · Carson, Durham, Fadeley, Gillette, Graber
324 Or. 40; 920 P.2d 1097; 1996 Ore. LEXIS 80

State v. Barajas

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of State v. Cookman, 324 Or 19, 920 P2d 1086 (1996).

Gillette, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Concurring in Part

GILLETTE, J.,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons expressed in my concurring and dissenting opinion in State v. Cookman, 324 Or 19, 920 P2d 1086 (1996).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑