Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

State v. Barajas

Oregon Supreme Court
State v. Barajas, 324 Or. 40 (Or. 1996)
920 P.2d 1097; 1996 Ore. LEXIS 80
Carson, Durham, Fadeley, Gillette, Graber

State v. Barajas

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of State v. Cookman, 324 Or 19, 920 P2d 1086 (1996).

Gillette, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Concurring in Part

GILLETTE, J.,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons expressed in my concurring and dissenting opinion in State v. Cookman, 324 Or 19, 920 P2d 1086 (1996).

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE OF OREGON, on Review v. LUCILO ROMERO BARAJAS, on Review
Status
Published
↑