Oregon Supreme Court, 1996

Keenan v. Maass

Oregon Supreme Court · Decided October 8, 1996 · Allow, Fadeley, Review, Would

324 Or. 230; 923 P.2d 1200; 1996 Ore. LEXIS 104

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Dunn v. Hill (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
Keenan v. Maass (Or. Ct. App. 1997)
Andrews v. R.W. Hays Co. (Or. Ct. App. 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Billings v. Gates, 323 Or 167, 916 P2d 291 (1996).

Fadeley, J., would not allow petition for review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.