Kane v. Myers
Kane v. Myers
Opinion
Filed: May 14, 1998
HENRY KANE,
Petitioner,
v.
HARDY MYERS, Attorney
General, State of Oregon,
Respondent,
and
RICHARD BAYER,
Intervenor.
On petition to review ballot title.
Submitted on the record May 4, 1998.
Henry Kane, pro se, filed the petition.
Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the answering memorandum for respondent. With him on the answering memorandum were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Charles F. Hinkle, ACLU Foundation of Oregon, Portland, filed the memorandum for intervenor.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Kulongoski, and Leeson, Justices.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petition for judicial review of ballot title dismissed.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is a proceeding for judicial review of a ballot title certified by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative measure. See ORS 250.085 (providing procedure for judicial review of ballot title). Notice of petitioner's challenge to the Attorney General's certified ballot title was not given to the Secretary of State within the time provided in ORS 250.085(4). This court therefore has no authority to review the ballot title, and the petition must be dismissed. Sizemore v. Myers, 327 Or 71, ___ P2d ___ (1998).
Petition for judicial review of ballot title dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.