Novick v. Myers
Novick v. Myers
Opinion of the Court
The modified ballot title for Initiative Petition 48 (2002) states:
“AMENDS CONSTITUTION: DISTRIBUTES FIFTEEN PERCENT OF ALL STATE INCOME TAX REVENUE TO SOME LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, SERVICE DISTRICTS
“RESULT OF YES’ VOTE: “Yes’ vote requires distribution of fifteen percent of state income tax revenue (reduced by amount of certain local taxes) to some local governments, service districts.
“RESULT OF ‘NO’ VOTE: ‘No’ vote retains the current tax system where personal and corporate income tax revenue collected by the state is directed to the state general fund.
“SUMMARY: Amends Constitution. Currently, state tax revenue collected from personal and corporate income is directed to the state general fund and is used to fund education, public safety, human services, and other state programs. Measure requires percentage of all state income tax revenue to be ‘equitably’ distributed for unrestricted use to the general funds of some local governments and local service districts providing ‘essential services.’ Measure does not define ‘equitably’ or ‘essential services.’ Excludes local school districts, metropolitan service districts from ‘local government’ definition. Distributes five percent in 2003; ten percent in 2004; fifteen percent thereafter. Reduces share distributed to local governments imposing taxes on*449 personal or business income, revenue, or profits. Reduces revenue available for state government expenditures and provides no replacement funds. Other provisions.”
The modified ballot title is certified. The appellate judgment shall issue in accordance with ORS 250.085(9).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Steven NOVICK v. Hardy MYERS, Attorney General for the State of Oregon
- Status
- Published