Novick v. Myers
Novick v. Myers
Opinion of the Court
The modified ballot title for Initiative Petition 47 (2002) states:
“AMENDS CONSTITUTION: ALLOCATES TEN PERCENT OF INCOME TAX REVENUES FOR HIGHWAYS; DISTRIBUTES SOME REVENUE TO CITIES, COUNTIES
“RESULT OF YES’ VOTE: Yes’ vote allocates ten percent of income tax revenue to supplement highway funding; distributes some revenue to cities, counties; reduces revenue for other state expenditures.
“RESULT OF ‘NO’ VOTE: ‘No’ vote retains current manner of funding public highway construction and maintenance through dedicated fuel taxes, registration and licensing fees, and federal and local money.
“SUMMARY: Amends constitution. Currently federal and state money, dedicated funds (fuel taxes, registration, licensing fees) finance highway construction and maintenance. Measure supplements existing highway funding by allocating ten percent of state income and excise tax revenue (divided equally between state, local entities) along with federal highway money and all taxes, fees on vehicle fuel and use to segregated fund for highway construction and maintenance. Requires 40 percent or more of state taxes and fees on motor vehicle fuel and use (including vehicle registration fees) to be ‘equitably distributed to cities and counties; they currently receive 39.95 percent. Does not define ‘equitably.’ Reduces revenue available for other state*100 expenditures; provides no replacement funding. Eliminates current authority to use highway funds for administration, bond retirement, parks. Other provisions.”
The modified ballot title is certified. The appellate judgment shall issue in accordance with ORS 250.085(9).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Steven NOVICK v. Hardy MYERS, Attorney General, State of Oregon
- Status
- Published