In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Roberts

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that, in the course of representing the conservator of the estate of a protected person, the accused violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(4) (conduct prejudicial to administration of justice) and DR 6-101(A) (incompetent representation). The trial panel concluded that the accused had violated those rules and that the appropriate sanction was a 60-day suspension from the practice of law. The accused sought review under Bar Rule of Procedure (BR) 10.3.

We review de novo. ORS 9.536(3); BR 10.6. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the accused knowingly violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and negligently violated DR 6-101(A). An explanation of the facts of this proceeding or our application of the law to those facts would not benefit the bench, the Bar, or the public. We further conclude that a 60-day suspension is the appropriate sanction.

The accused is suspended from the practice of law for a period of 60 days, commencing 60 days from the filing of this decision.