Wels v. Hippe
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bo and Lia Holdings LLC v. 2021 Morrison LLC (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
- Curry Properties, Inc. v. Coldiron (Or. Ct. App. 2026)
- Langjahr v. Glorietta Bay, LLC (Or. Ct. App. 2025)
- Hisey v. Patrick (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
- Creekside Homeowners Assn. v. Creekside Golf Course (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
- Waters v. Klippel Water, Inc. (Or. Ct. App. 2020)
- Albany & Eastern Railroad Co. v. Martell?? (Or. 2020)
- Albany & E. R.R. Co. v. Martell (Or. Ct. App. 2019)
- Ellison v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The petition for reconsideration is allowed. The former opinion is modified and adhered to as modified.
Defendants have petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion in Wels v. Hippe, 360 Or 569, 385 P3d 1028 (2016). Defendants prevailed but seek clarification of our instruction remanding the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Defendants assert that this instruction requires the trial court to vacate its original judgment in favor of plaintiff and enter judgment in favor of defendants, rather than holding a new trial and allowing plaintiff to present further evidence. We agree that clarification is warranted as follows: The case is remanded to the circuit court for entry of judgment in defendants’ favor, and the award of costs is modified accordingly.
The petition for reconsideration is allowed. The former opinion is modified and adhered to as modified.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.