Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1892

Coursin v. Shrader

Coursin v. Shrader
Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas · Decided January 4, 1892 · Bben, Clark, Collum, Mitchell, Paxson, Pee, Williams
146 Pa. 475; 23 A. 801; 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1251

Counsel

Mr. Isaac S. Van Voorhis (with him Mr. John S. Ferguson), for the appellant., Messrs. RoVb Fitzsimmons, for the appellee, filed no brief.

Coursin v. Shrader

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam :

The appellant has assigned a single extract from the charge of the court below, as error. An examination of the charge as a whole shows that the learned judge fairly submitted to the jury the question of the payment of the mortgage. If paid, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The jury having found, under proper instructions, that the mortgage had not been, paid, the verdict for plaintiff naturally followed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.