Quashnock v. Sigmund
Opinion of the Court
In this case it appears that both relator and defendant are, and were at all significant times, duly elected Commisisoners of Reserve Township, a township of the first class. Pursuant to section 701 of the First Class Township Code of June 24, 1931, P. L. 1206, art. VII, sec. 701, as
We agree that the contention of defendant is correct. The same question was decided many years ago in the case of Commonwealth ex rel. Mayer v. Pape, 21 Dist. R. 1123. To be sure, the First Class Township Act has undergone some changes since 1912, but nowhere in the present act, do we find any expression of legislative intent indicating a contrary view of the law on this question.
We have given careful consideration to the applicable constitutional provisions and as a result are obliged to hold that the office of president of the board of township commissioners is an appointive office within the meaning of article VI, sec. 4, of the Constitution. Therefore, a person holding such office may be removed at the pleasure of the board of commissioners.
Defendant’s demurrer must be sustained and the complaint dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.