Althouse v. Hunsberger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Althouse v. Hunsberger, 6 Pa. Super. 160 (1897)
1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329
Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Smith, Wickham

Althouse v. Hunsberger

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The very earnest argument of the defendant’s counsel has failed to convince us that the court committed error in discharging the rule entered in the present case or in entering judgment in the succeeding case. Its action in both cases is so thoroughly vindicated in the opinions filed as to render further discussion unnecessary and unprofitable.

Order affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Reference

Full Case Name
P. A. Althouse v. Mrs. James B. Hunsberger, Catherine M. Hunsperger
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Judgment — When application to set aside maintained. An application to vacate and set aside a judgment can be maintained only on the ground of defects apparent on the face of the record. Judgment — Mistaken name — Service of process. If a party is sued by a wrong or fictitious name, or by some designation which includes a part only of his name, and is personally served with process, and fails to urge the misnomer in any way, a judgment entered against him by such mistaken, fictitious or imperfect name, is valid and enforceable. Catharine M. Hunsberger was sued as Mrs. James B. Hunsperger, was' served with process and allowed judgment to be entered against her by default under that name. Held, that Catharine M. Hunsperger is not in position to urge this mispomer, or use of a fictitious name as constituting a defect vitiating the judgment as between herself and the holder of it. Judgment — Motion to strike off- — Laches—Equity. Where the record shows that defendant, being served with process in a suit before an alderman, failed to defend the same but suffered judgment by default, and neglected to take an appeal or certiorari, by one or the other of which every right she subsequently alleged in a petition to strike off the judgment, might have been adequately protected, the court will not exercise its equitable power to stay execution or interfere with the judgment.