Althouse v. Hunsberger
Althouse v. Hunsberger
6 Pa. Super. 160; 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329
Althouse v. Hunsberger
Opinion of the Court
The very earnest argument of the defendant’s counsel has failed to convince us that the court committed error in discharging the rule entered in the present case or in entering judgment in the succeeding case. Its action in both cases is so thoroughly vindicated in the opinions filed as to render further discussion unnecessary and unprofitable.
Order affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.