Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899

Rieseck v. Lanahan

Rieseck v. Lanahan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 18, 1899 · Beaver, Beeber, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Smith
10 Pa. Super. 281; 1899 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272
Rieseck v. Lanahan

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, we held that an order allowing a transcript of appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace to be filed nunc pro tunc is interlocutory, and from it an independent appeal does not lie. This conclusion was reached after a full consideration of the question and we see no reason for not adhering to it. See also Starr’s Estate, 3 Pa. Superior Ct. 212, Drum v. Uplinger, 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 404, and Powell v. Gayley, 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 405.

The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant, and the record is remitted with a procedendo.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.