Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1901

Epler v. Metzger

Epler v. Metzger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 16, 1901 · Beaver, Orlady, Pee, Porter, Rice, Smith
17 Pa. Super. 56; 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 252

Epler v. Metzger

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

It is unnecessary to discuss the motion to quash. The assignments of error are without merit. The question was not as to the effect of an admittedly genuine receipt in full, but as *59to the execution of the receipt offered by the defendant. The instructions of the learned judge as to the burden of proof were quite as favorable to the defendant as he had a right to ask.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.