Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906

Haspel v. O'Brien

Haspel v. O'Brien
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 19, 1906 · Beaveb, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Oready, Pee, Poetes, Rice
32 Pa. Super. 147; 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 306

Haspel v. O'Brien

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

A reconsideration of the substantial question raised on these appeals, with the aid of the argument of the appellant’s counsel, has failed to convince us that our rulings in Martin v. Greenwood, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 245, and Oil City B. & L. *148Assn. v. Shanfelter, 29 Pa. Superior Ct. 251, were erroneous, and ought to be overruled. Nor can we see that any useful purpose would be served by .further discussion of the question on our part.

The order appealed from in each of the foregoing cases is affirmed at the appellant’s costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.