Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907

Leisenring v. Nanticoke Borough

Leisenring v. Nanticoke Borough
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 15, 1907 · Beaver, Cubiam, Head, Henderson, Orlady, Porter, Rice
33 Pa. Super. 305; 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 287

Leisenring v. Nanticoke Borough

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam,

Apart from the questions involved in the first, second and third assignments, a majority of the judges who heard this case are of opinion that no reversible error appears in the record; but as to the question raised by the request for binding instructions and the motion for judgment for defendant non*310obstante veredicto, and as to the question, whether, in view of the instructions given in the general charge, there was reversible error in not unqualified^ affirming the defendant’s fourth point, the judges are equally divided in opinion. Therefore the judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.