Nagle v. Nagle
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Nagle v. Nagle, 43 Pa. Super. 442 (1910)
1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 70
Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Nagle v. Nagle
Opinion of the Court
The facts of this case are clearly set forth in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas, and need not be restated by us. We have carefully examined the evidence and are all of opinion that his conclusions of fact are sustained thereby. It follows that the refusal to set aside the decree of divorce was not error.
The order discharging the rule to show cause why the decree of divorce made in the above case on August 2, 1897, should not be vacated and set aside, is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.
Reference
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Divorce — Setting aside decree — Fraud—Laches. A decree in divorce granted against a wife for adultery will not be set aside on the ground of alleged collusion between the wife's attorney and the libelant, the husband, where it appears that the wife signed and swore to an answer to the libel, knew of the decree within four days after it was granted, subsequently sold her property as a feme sole, married another man in eight months and was again divorced, permitted the libelant to marry again, and took no steps to set aside the decree until ten years after it was entered, and when the libelant’s second wife was still living.