Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913

Frey v. Gingrich

Frey v. Gingrich
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided December 8, 1913 · Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
55 Pa. Super. 415; 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 387

Frey v. Gingrich

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order refusing to open a judgment entered upon confession by an attorney and twice revived by scire facias, in each of which instances, judgment was taken on,two returns of nihil. Notwith*421standing the earnest argument of appellant’s counsel, we are of opinion, that the learned judge proceeded on correct principles of law and equity in passing upon the application, and that his conclusions of fact are so well supported by the evidence that we ought not to disturb them. In view of the clear and satisfactory opinion filed by him, no useful purpose would be subserved by a further discussion by us of the questions of fact and law involved.

The order is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.