Emmons v. Courtenay
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Emmons v. Courtenay, 66 Pa. Super. 35 (1917)
1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 185
Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams
Emmons v. Courtenay
Opinion of the Court
Only disputed questions of fact are involved in this appeal. The case was tried by a judge of the Municipal Court without a jury, and resulted in a finding in favor of the plaintiff. No authority is cited by the appellant, suggesting an error on any question of law involved on the trial. The opinion of Judge Knowles is fully sustained by an examination of the testimony, and for the reasons he gives, the judgment is affirmed.
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeals — Review—Findings of fact by Municipal Gourt of Philadelphia County. Where a case is tried by a judge of the Municipal Oourt of Philadelphia County without a jury, and only disputed questions of fact are involved, a finding in favor of the plaintiff on competent testimony will not be reversed by the appellate court in the absence of manifest error or abuse of discretion.