Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Pennsylvania /Cases /Pennsylvania Superior and Commonwealth Courts /

1917

418 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1917.

  • United States Casualty Co. v. Mather 67 Pa. Super. 42, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Console v. Prudential Insurance 67 Pa. Super. 52, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Steinman v. Feldser 67 Pa. Super. 58, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Maxwell's Estate 67 Pa. Super. 63, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Maxwell's Estate 67 Pa. Super. 68, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Harding v. Pen Argyl National Bank 67 Pa. Super. 68, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Birnie v. Birnie 67 Pa. Super. 74, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Kane v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. 67 Pa. Super. 80, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Howard v. Boverman 67 Pa. Super. 83, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Mastbaum v. Stuart 67 Pa. Super. 85, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Rawlings v. Erwin Motor & Machine Co. 67 Pa. Super. 88, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Daly v. Copeland 67 Pa. Super. 91, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Great Bend Township v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. 67 Pa. Super. 95, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Osbourn v. Magee Carpet Co. 67 Pa. Super. 100, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Limestone Township Road 67 Pa. Super. 105, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Reed v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 67 Pa. Super. 110, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Zillic v. Minnich 67 Pa. Super. 122, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Old Forge Borough v. Foley Estate 67 Pa. Super. 125, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Hoover v. Pursel 67 Pa. Super. 130, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Commonwealth v. McCarthy 67 Pa. Super. 135, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Jennings v. Grand Fraternity 67 Pa. Super. 139, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Stevens v. Baldy 67 Pa. Super. 145, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Mansel 67 Pa. Super. 149, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Wertz v. Williamsport 67 Pa. Super. 156, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Hoffman v. Adair 67 Pa. Super. 164, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Commonwealth v. Dong Lee 67 Pa. Super. 168, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Haltzel Furniture Co. v. Thompson 67 Pa. Super. 170, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Bower v. New Era Ass'n 67 Pa. Super. 175, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Kearney v. Security Ins. 67 Pa. Super. 179, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Diffenderfer v. Pennsylvania Railroad 67 Pa. Super. 187, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Fetrow's Estate 67 Pa. Super. 192, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Houck v. Webster 67 Pa. Super. 199, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Jordan v. Vare 67 Pa. Super. 202, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Hazelwood Dock Co. v. One House Boat 67 Pa. Super. 207, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Berreski v. Philadelphia Electric Co. 67 Pa. Super. 215, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Diamond Power Specialty Co. v. Milne 67 Pa. Super. 223, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Smolevitz v. Slonimsky 67 Pa. Super. 227, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • McCaffrey v. Lukens 67 Pa. Super. 231, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Canton Borough v. Williams 67 Pa. Super. 239, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Diehl v. Ellis 67 Pa. Super. 252, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Stewart v. Turner 67 Pa. Super. 255, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Harkins v. Pennsylvania Mutual Life Insurance 67 Pa. Super. 261, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Bell Telephone Co. v. Hazleton 67 Pa. Super. 264, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Scheffel v. Williamsport Passenger Railway Co. 67 Pa. Super. 272, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Howland v. Home Insurance Co. of New York 67 Pa. Super. 276, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Commonwealth v. Graffius 67 Pa. Super. 281, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Mack v. Holsopple 67 Pa. Super. 291, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Hook v. Welch 67 Pa. Super. 297, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Pottsville Union Traction Co. v. Public Service Commission 67 Pa. Super. 301, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
  • Pottsville Union Traction Co. v. Public Service Commission 67 Pa. Super. 304, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑