Pile v. Torpin
Pile v. Torpin
69 Pa. Super. 567; 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 446
Pile v. Torpin
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
The findings of fact filed by the late Judge Ralston were afterwards approved and adopted by the court in banc. It is clear to us they were supported by evidence and therefore they come to this court as if they had been found by a jury after a proper trial. These facts having been thus established, the legal conclusion that the bill should be dismissed was inevitable.
We can find nothing in the record that would warrant us in disturbing or setting aside the findings of fact re
Decree affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.