Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Pennsylvania /Cases /Pennsylvania Superior and Commonwealth Courts /

1918

272 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1918.

  • Agostinis v. Piekarski 70 Pa. Super. 279, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Wesoky v. Jackson 70 Pa. Super. 281, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • McDonald v. Kimmell 70 Pa. Super. 282, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Gerli v. Perfect Silk Throwing Co. 70 Pa. Super. 299, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Drayer v. Roudebush 70 Pa. Super. 330, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Caldwell v. Caldwell 70 Pa. Super. 332, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Ford Motor Co. v. Quinn 70 Pa. Super. 337, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Goehring's Estate 70 Pa. Super. 340, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Leonard v. Warfield 70 Pa. Super. 342, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Girts v. Shaw 70 Pa. Super. 345, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • West Liberty Avenue 70 Pa. Super. 348, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Ciszkowicz v. Scranton Railway Co. 70 Pa. Super. 352, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Bair v. Chambers 70 Pa. Super. 356, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Dodson v. Brown 70 Pa. Super. 359, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Jenkins v. Statler 70 Pa. Super. 388, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • North Shore Railroad v. Pennsylvania Co. 70 Pa. Super. 405, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Holyland v. Protected Home Circle 71 Pa. Super. 66, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Commonwealth v. Gayton 69 Pa. Super. 513, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Erickson v. Sutherland 69 Pa. Super. 516, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Concordia Silk Hosiery Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad 69 Pa. Super. 361, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Scattergood v. Michigan Central Railroad 69 Pa. Super. 367, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Emademe v. Weadick 69 Pa. Super. 369, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Lit Bros. v. Hare 69 Pa. Super. 372, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Schuylkill Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Public Service Commission 69 Pa. Super. 400, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Pennsylvania Railroad v. Public Service Commission 69 Pa. Super. 404, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Kane & Elk Railroad v. Public Service Commission 69 Pa. Super. 413, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Diehl v. Public Service Commission 69 Pa. Super. 419, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Public Service Commission 69 Pa. Super. 421, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Commonwealth v. Thomas 69 Pa. Super. 424, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Knox v. Catholic Women's Benevolent Legion 69 Pa. Super. 426, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Provost v. Davidowitz 69 Pa. Super. 429, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Hance's Estate 69 Pa. Super. 432, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Commonwealth v. Bishop 69 Pa. Super. 435, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Monk v. Magee Carpet Co. 69 Pa. Super. 436, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Commonwealth v. Fox 69 Pa. Super. 456, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Police Beneficiary Ass'n v. Ætna Life Ins. 69 Pa. Super. 460, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Matawan Tile Co. v. Russo 69 Pa. Super. 464, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Zentmyer v. Zentmyer 69 Pa. Super. 496, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Commonwealth v. Bird 69 Pa. Super. 501, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Appeal of World's Museum of Anatomy 69 Pa. Super. 505, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Farmers & Breeders Mutual Reserve Fund Live Stock Insurance v. Elliott 69 Pa. Super. 509, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Myrtetus's Estate 69 Pa. Super. 318, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Stewart v. Stewart 69 Pa. Super. 328, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Kelly v. Werner Co. 69 Pa. Super. 342, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Hilton v. Overly 69 Pa. Super. 348, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Cray v. Lynn 69 Pa. Super. 474, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Adams v. United Light, Heat & Power Co. 69 Pa. Super. 478, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Towanda Borough v. Fell 69 Pa. Super. 468, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Sessa v. Rozzi 68 Pa. Super. 593, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
  • Lammot v. Home of the Merciful Saviour 68 Pa. Super. 597, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑