Goldstrohm v. First National Bank
Goldstrohm v. First National Bank
72 Pa. Super. 55; 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 246
Goldstrohm v. First National Bank
Opinion of the Court
The defendant in this case is asking for a third trial. In the one from which this appeal is taken, the disputed ■facts were so fairly submitted to the jury that no exception was taken to the charge of the court. The verdict as rendered was considered as excessive, and considering all the circumstances the court in banc reduced it to seven hundred dollars, with the suggestion, “This litigation should be ended.” We concur in this, and find no reversible error to warrant another trial.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.