Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919

Horrell v. Reeves

Horrell v. Reeves
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided July 17, 1919 · Head, Henderson, Keller, Oklady, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams
72 Pa. Super. 129; 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266

Horrell v. Reeves

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Oklady, P. J.,

The only assignment of error presented for our consideration is, that the court erred in overruling a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto on a verdict found in favor of the defendants.

The charge of the court and the opinion filed in refusing the defendants’ motion furnish a conclusive answer to the argument presented by the appellant. On the trial the plaintiff presented a point asking for binding instructions in his favor, which was refused and the disputed questions of fact were fairly submitted in an adequate charge. The verdict returned was fully warranted by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.