Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926

Commonwealth v. Connolly

Commonwealth v. Connolly
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 16, 1926 · Porter, Portee, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham
89 Pa. Super. 243; 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40

Commonwealth v. Connolly

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

This appeal involves only the same questions which have been considered in opinions this day filed in the cases of Commonwealth v. Hunsinger and Commonwealth v. Dabbiero, and for the reasons in those opinions stated, the assignments of error are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below, and it is ordered that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.