1927
354 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1927.
- Crowl Building Co. v. Beacon Match Co. 91 Pa. Super. 580, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- County of Franklin v. McClean 93 Pa. Super. 165, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Smith v. Faust 92 Pa. Super. 267, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Toth v. Reading Co. 94 Pa. Super. 360, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Seitzinger v. Seitzinger 91 Pa. Super. 607, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Hoeveler-Stutz Co. v. Bodman & Royer 92 Pa. Super. 433, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Rodgers v. Woodcock Valley Telephone Co. 92 Pa. Super. 445, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Electric City Motors, Inc. v. Ross 92 Pa. Super. 463, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Bowser v. Milliron Construction Co. 93 Pa. Super. 34, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth v. Mack 92 Pa. Super. 165, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Hoeveler-Stutz Co. v. Cleveland Motor Sales 92 Pa. Super. 425, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Marquette-Bailey Lumber Co. v. Gibboney 91 Pa. Super. 604, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Kooyman v. Lotz & Co. 92 Pa. Super. 68, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth v. Seventeen & One-Half Barrels & Seventy-Two Tanks of Beer 93 Pa. Super. 84, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Stein v. Kessler 92 Pa. Super. 359, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- City Club v. Public Service Commission 92 Pa. Super. 219, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Munkenbeck v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. 92 Pa. Super. 442, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Mohawk Glove Corp. v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. 92 Pa. Super. 460, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Krauss v. Cohn or Cohen 93 Pa. Super. 101, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Waltman v. Germantown Trust Co. 92 Pa. Super. 480, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Modern Home Heating Co. v. Diehl 92 Pa. Super. 571, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Wassel Et Ux. v. Ludwig 92 Pa. Super. 341, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth v. Magid and Dickstein 91 Pa. Super. 513, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Heyl v. Bary 92 Pa. Super. 352, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- E. & S. Motor Transportation Co. Ex Rel. Freeston v. World Fire & Marine Insurance 92 Pa. Super. 235, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Weiner Kurtzberg v. Osnofsky 92 Pa. Super. 143, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Mink v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. 93 Pa. Super. 63, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Ensell v. Atlantic Refining Co. 92 Pa. Super. 590, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ritter v. Ritter 91 Pa. Super. 563, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Rothweiler v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. 93 Pa. Super. 369, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Ensell v. Atlantic Refining Co. 92 Pa. Super. 586, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Mack v. Atlantic City R.R. Co. 92 Pa. Super. 455, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Lipman Manufacturing Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 93 Pa. Super. 128, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Brown v. Cunningham Cab Co. 92 Pa. Super. 356, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Wescott v. Geiger 92 Pa. Super. 80, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Uhler v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co. 93 Pa. Super. 262, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Connor v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co. 94 Pa. Super. 374, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Friedman v. Huber 92 Pa. Super. 245, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Sagransky v. T.M. F. Ins. Co., Ltd. 92 Pa. Super. 500, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth v. Arcurio 92 Pa. Super. 404, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth v. One Nash Roadster 91 Pa. Super. 600, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth v. Ruff 92 Pa. Super. 530, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Slade v. Slade 91 Pa. Super. 533, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Feingold v. American Railway Express Co. 92 Pa. Super. 76, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth v. McHenry 92 Pa. Super. 162, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Commonwealth v. McLaughlin 91 Pa. Super. 550, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. Edson Brothers 92 Pa. Super. 496, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Petroleum Fuel Engineering Co. v. Hemphill 94 Pa. Super. 362, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Curry v. Wolstencroft 93 Pa. Super. 20, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)
- Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Burstein Bros. 92 Pa. Super. 206, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927)