Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929

Commonwealth of Pa. Rel. Hassell v. Hassell

Commonwealth of Pa. Rel. Hassell v. Hassell
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 2, 1929 · Porter, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baldrige
97 Pa. Super. 112; 1929 Pa. Super. LEXIS 228

Commonwealth of Pa. Rel. Hassell v. Hassell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The portion of the record certified and sent up on this appeal is insufficient to enable this court properly to pass on the merits. As the assistant district attorney, who appeared at the bar of the court, stated that if the record were remitted, he would at once cause a petition to be filed on behalf of the relator providing for a hearing de novo on the merits, we have concluded to remit the record so that such petition may be filed.

Record remitted for purpose stated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.