Smith v. Julius Weidner
Smith v. Julius Weidner
157 A. 25; 102 Pa. Super. 417; 1931 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192
Smith v. Julius Weidner
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Appellee was injured in the same accident which gave rise to the case of Mooney v. Weidner, No. 106 April Term, 1931, in which an opinion has been filed this day. For the reasons there expressed we conclude that appellee herein was an employee of appellant at the time of injury and not an independent contractor and that he is therefore entitled to compensation.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.