Davis v. Mundy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Davis v. Mundy, 162 A. 717 (1932)
106 Pa. Super. 486; 1932 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272
Cueiam, Tbexler, Keller, Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baldbige, Stadteelu, Parker

Davis v. Mundy

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

On March. 17, 1930, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in a. suit to recover damages resulting from a collision of two automobiles. On March 6, 1931, an attachment execution was issued thereon against the Employers Reinsurance Corporation of Kansas City, as garnishee, and answers to interrogatories were made, admitting certain matters, but denying liability. A rule for judgment against the garnishee on its answers was entered. The court discharged the. rule. The plaintiff appealed.

The order of the court is interlocutory, and we cannot consider it. The order is not appealable. Brendlinger v. Riegel, 37 Pa. Superior Ct. 474; Quaker City National Bank v. Brooks, 296 Pa. 501.

The appeal is quashed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Davis, Appellant, v. Mundy Et Al.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published