Cunningham v. Kitchen
Cunningham v. Kitchen
181 A. 387; 119 Pa. Super. 382; 1935 Pa. Super. LEXIS 211
Cunningham v. Kitchen
Opinion of the Court
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Culver. The statement in the opinion that βIt was too late [for the defendant], to declare the forfeiture after plaintiff had tendered him the full amount due him in accordance with his demands,β is sustained by the language used by Mr. Justice Kephart in the case of White Co. to use, etc. v. Union Transfer Co., 270 Pa. 514, 517, 113 A. 432.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.