Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939

Jennings v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 17, 1939 · Cueiam, Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker, Rhodes, Hirt

7 A.2d 96; 136 Pa. Super. 16; 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 173 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

For the reasons so clearly stated by Judge Caee, of the court below, in his dissenting opinion, which will be found in the reporter’s statement, we are of opinion that the judgment on the award in favor of the claimant must be reversed and judgment entered for the defendant. 1

It is so ordered.

See also Elder v. Penna. R. R. Co., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 137, 148, 180 A. 183; Martini v. Director General, 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 529, 534; Phila. & R. Ry. Co. v. Di Donato, 256 U. S. 327, 329; Bauchspies v. Central R. of N. J., 287 Pa. 590, 135 A. 728; Glunt v. Penna. R. R. Co., 249 Pa. 522, 95 A. 109.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.