Commonwealth v. BAUDER

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. BAUDER, 188 Pa. Super. 424 (1958)
145 A.2d 915; 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 620
Rhodes, P.J., Hirt, Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins

Commonwealth v. BAUDER

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The orders of the court below are affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Henninger as reported in 14 Pa. D. & C. 2d 571.

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Gunther, J.:

Substantially for the reasons expressed in Commonwealth v. Taber, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 415, 145 A. 2d 908, and for the admitted discrimination which I consider arbitrary and in violation of the equal protection clause of the federal Constitution, I dissent.

Watkins, J., joins in this dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
Commonwealth v. Bauder Et Al., Appellants
Cited By
14 cases
Status
Published