Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1958

Commonwealth v. BAUDER

Commonwealth v. BAUDER
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 14, 1958 · Rhodes, P.J., Hirt, Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins
188 Pa. Super. 424; 145 A.2d 915; 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 620

Commonwealth v. BAUDER

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The orders of the court below are affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Henninger as reported in 14 Pa. D. & C. 2d 571.

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Gunther, J.:

Substantially for the reasons expressed in Commonwealth v. Taber, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 415, 145 A. 2d 908, and for the admitted discrimination which I consider arbitrary and in violation of the equal protection clause of the federal Constitution, I dissent.

Watkins, J., joins in this dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑