Commonwealth v. Muth
Commonwealth v. Muth
188 Pa. Super. 401; 147 A.2d 169; 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 616
Commonwealth v. Muth
Dissenting Opinion
Dissenting Opinion by
For the reasons expressed in my dissent in Commonwealth v. Weik, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, 147 A. 2d 164, I dissent from the majority opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In this case it was stipulated by counsel that the testimony would be the same as in the case of Commonwealth v. Weik, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, 147 A. 2d 164, “except as to weights.” In the present case the evidence showed that the overweight was 5,010 pounds.
The decision in this case is controlled by the opinion filed herewith in Commonwealth v. Weik, supra.
The judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.