Donaldson v. P. J. Oesterling & Sons, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Donaldson v. P. J. Oesterling & Sons, Inc., 199 Pa. Super. 637 (1962)
186 A.2d 653; 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 625
Ehodes, Ervin, Flood, Montgomery, Watkins, Woodside, Wright

Donaldson v. P. J. Oesterling & Sons, Inc.

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

The evidence in this case is not sufficient to sustain the finding that the presumption of the continuance of the meretricious relationship had been overcome. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Wrigi-it, J., joins in this dissent.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Herman M. Rodgers, for the court below, reported at 28 Pa. D. & C. 2d 583.

Reference

Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published