Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962

Donaldson v. P. J. Oesterling & Sons, Inc.

Donaldson v. P. J. Oesterling & Sons, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided December 12, 1962 · Ehodes, Ervin, Flood, Montgomery, Watkins, Woodside, Wright
199 Pa. Super. 637; 186 A.2d 653; 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 625

Donaldson v. P. J. Oesterling & Sons, Inc.

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

The evidence in this case is not sufficient to sustain the finding that the presumption of the continuance of the meretricious relationship had been overcome. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Wrigi-it, J., joins in this dissent.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Herman M. Rodgers, for the court below, reported at 28 Pa. D. & C. 2d 583.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑