Opinion by

This case presents the identical questions raised in Com. v. Herb, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 119, 235 A. 2d 429, which we have decided in an opinion filed concurrently herewith.

The only difference between the cases was that Herb was accused of “following too closely” while Siderias was charged with “unreasonable and improper speed.”

For the reasons set forth in Com. v. Herb, supra, the order of the court below is affirmed.