Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1972

Ballariel v. Hoagerhyde

Ballariel v. Hoagerhyde
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 24, 1972 · Cer, Hoeeman, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Oone, Spaulding, Watkins, Weight
220 Pa. Super. 414; 289 A.2d 131; 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1923

Ballariel v. Hoagerhyde

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This appeal presents the same question which was decided by our Court in Szarmack v. Welch, 220 Pa. Superior Ct. 407, 289 A. 2d 149 (1972). For the reasons given in Szarmack, we hold that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4007(a) requires the disclosure of the existence and policy limits of liability insurance coverage.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑