Commonwealth v. Bachman
Commonwealth v. Bachman
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
On March 26, 1971, the appellee, Paul E. Bachman, was apprehended and charged with operating a motor vehicle while his operating privileges were suspended in violation of Section 624(6) of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, as amended, 75 P.S. §624(6). On June 9, 1972, he was convicted of this offense, then denominated a misdemeanor.
That Mr. Bachman violated the statute is not disputed. The lower court’s action was based on (1) a finding that Mr. Bachman’s operation of the motor vehicle was “inadvertent,” (2) the Court’s belief that a one year’s suspension would work an economic hardship, and
Our opinion in Commonwealth v. Bensing, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 71, 315 A.2d 897 (1974) is controlling. There, Judge WILKINSON noted that no one may regard driving during a suspension, after surrendering an operator’s license, as inadvertent.
Order
And Now, this 2nd day of April, 1975, the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Snyder County is reversed and the Order of suspension imposed by the Secretary of Transportation is reinstated. A reinstated suspension shall be issued by the Secretary of Transportation within 30 days.
. By the Act of May 26, 1972, P.L. 313, 75 P.S. §624 (Supp. 1974-1975) effective July 25, 1972, the offense of violation of Section 624(6) was reclassified a summary offense.
. Mr. Bachman had driven 65 miles immediately before his apprehension.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.