Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976

Commonwealth v. Kale

Commonwealth v. Kale
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided December 20, 1976 · Voort
244 Pa. Super. 574; 371 A.2d 859

Commonwealth v. Kale

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

There is no indication on the record that appellant received the required written notice prior to his probation revocation hearing. The *575judgment of sentence, therefore, is reversed and the case remanded with instructions to hold a new probation revocation hearing after written notice of the alleged violations. Commonwealth v. Stratton, 235 Pa.Superior Ct. 566, 344 A.2d 636 (1975); Commonwealth v. Henderson, 234 Pa.Superior Ct. 498, 340 A.2d 483 (1975); Commonwealth v. Alexander, 232 Pa.Superior Ct. 57, 331 A.2d 836 (1974).

VAN der VOORT, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.